Sunday, April 5, 2009

I hate your mutt. I just do.

Just the other day I had gone over to a friend's place and I made her order Pizza for lunch. And when I wasn't paying attention my friend's dog came in and ate a slice of my(!) Pizza. That thief! Now I'd have murdered that animal then and there had my friend not intervened and gave me a slice from her pizza. Even though it wasn't the flavour that I ordered, I decided to show the dog some mercy on behalf of my friend who was willing to share more the pizza with me in return for the life of her dog.

People who know me are familiar with the fact that I don't like dogs at all. You see, I just don't see the point of people being so damn naive about dogs. I mean they're just animals for crying out loud. Just eat them up and get the ordeal over with.

Ever tried mentioning to a 'dog lover' that you don't like dogs? They'll grapple you with questions like "How can you not like dogs?" not counting comments such as "You're just cruel" and shit like that. I mean, doesn't a man have the rights to have his own opinion? I don't care if you love your pet, I don't have a pet, and I will feel free to hate yours with unparalleled tenacity. Fuck you.

You people are just every bit as annoying as those vegetarians who keep on preaching vegetarianism to every single person they meet on the slightest of mention that he/she is a non-vegetarian. So will that make me stop eating meat? No, I eat meat because it tastes great. I am that cruel so as to subject harmless little animals to slaughter just so I can have my tasteful of delicious juicy meat. Big-fucking-deal, last I checked we lived in a free country where we had the rights to have our own opinions about things without being forced to be subjected to your futile accusations.

Do you even realise that the privileges that you're bestowing upon that beloved mutt of yours are more than what many children in this country will ever receive? I know most of you spend more on your dog than many lower-middle class families can afford to spend on their child's education and welfare. So stop giving me the 'charitable' excuse to having that smelly thing share living quarters with you. If you're feeling so charitable, just give away all that money to a homeless shelter or something. Or better yet, give it to me, I could always use another 10-15 scale models.

And what's even more annoying is that your dog requires your attention 24 hours in a day. You can't bloody ignore the thing for one second without being subjected to barking and whimpering until you're forced to pet the flea infested animal. A dog would gladly give Paris Hilton competition in attention-whoring. It's like a stripper. It has to do the extra work to get your attention because you know damn well you wouldn't be paying it attention if it didn't have it's face dug up in your crotch.

If you were ever sensible enough, you'd get yourself a cat as a pet. Ever seen a cat eat its own poop? They're independent, they'll leave home for hours at an end doing what they please having their own little adventures. And you won't be home worried sick that your pet has wandered outside the threshold of your house and is incompetent to guide itself back home. On the other hands, dogs can't be expected to do anything for themselves, unless of course, it's eating your brand new shoes.

Now I've heard the "OMG JAMIE.. CATZZ R SOOOO MOODY.. LOLZZZZ" excuse. It just doesn't make sense to me. I mean, its ok for you to be moody and shoo away your pet when you're working or in a crappy mood, but it's not ok for your pet not to feel affectionate?

Summing it all up, pets don't make sense, and if I ever do want one, I'd get myself something with a personality as opposed to a tail chasing growling mutt. And I deem it about damn time we start taking the term "Hot Dog" seriously.

Go fry, I don't care about your opinions.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Will Someone Get These Feminists To Ever Shut It?

Heil Feminiza!



I meet far too many women around everyday who seem to be hell bent on taking the 'feminist' war out on men. I just fail to comprehend the idea. They talk about getting absolute gender equality, but if you ask me, absolute gender equality will never be. The physical distinction of the male and females in humans are far more prominent to ever allow that. You never see guys out complaining that women are being offered and reserved seats in the metro, while they're woefully ignored. Then there's Delhi University, which does not have one all boys college, and yet has countless all girls colleges. But you don't see men bickering about that every now and then. So why do I have to deal with you lot who cry hoarse about unequal wages and whatnot.


The Language Issues.
Idiotic feminists always start cribbing about how many female derogatory terms are there in the English language. "Oh my, you called me a 'chick', how dare you?". You really think such terms are offensive? Some women are so petty that they resent any male implication on the English language. So what if one day all the guys wake up and decide to remove all the derogatory male terms from English? Buddy, Chum, Pal, Dude, Stud, Hunk, Buster. So just to balance the scales, no female shall be allowed the use of the above terms because we will get offended.
Then there's the bit about some objects being referred to as females which feminists get all hyper about. Does it never occur to you that cars and all have always been referred to as females and that it is done not with the ulterior motive of offending you highly esteemed asses?



Women can't compete with men in many aspects. Fact.
Now this is the bit where I am prepared to take the most heated flak from all of you girls. Do you realise that men and women (oops.. let me say 'women and men' so as not to imply male superiority) are not born with the same physical features? Is it that hard for you to notice that on an average, the men are more physically strong and you can't compete with them in many aspects? I will give you areas where men DO have an edge over you.
Sports. There's a good reason why sports have different categories for men and women. Here I present to you some advice, go look up the world records for male and females in all the Olympic sports. No where but gymnastics are where girls are a match to the physical abilities of the guys. For those of you too lazy to go and do some research, I'll give you a few examples. Sports like athletics are totally male dominated, because the male set records every year are simply not matched by the females. Leave alone sports like weightlifting, where the best ever performance by a female is 305 kilograms, while men top the scales at 472.5 kgs. You want gender equality? Let there be no separate categories on gender lines. How many medals you think women will be home with? If I am to be concerned(and since this is my blog, it's my opinion which counts) ALL the medals with the exception of sissy sports like gymnastics will be to men. Now might I tell you I don't even consider the walk 'races' and gymnastics to be sports. I mean, these people get the same damn medal Usain Bolt got for his success for shaking their asses while walking and for making patterns in the air with a ribbon. Indeed how tough that must be, I say.
You can contradict me the day chicks start regularly winning the Ironman Triathalon. And if you bother to click on the link do me a favour and check out the difference in the male and female winning times.



Equal wages are only valid when you work equal.
So you bicker about how females don't get equal pay.Well, I'm pretty sure that in most of the jobs like journalism or teaching or banking, women DO get equal wages. If it is not the case, then I totally do understand sexual-discrimination is prevailant. The reason for the average women income being low is, that the fields where men and women are employed in are different because of their lifestyles. My dad is a mechanical engineer and he's off toiling on construction sites everyday. How many women work for engineering firms who ask for on-site availability? Not many. It's simply because of a difference in occupational choice. Women doctors are considered just as competent as their men counter-parts. Then there are professions where women are paid more than men. Air-hostesses being an example. You don't hear men complaining that it's hard for them to get equal wages as a receptionist. There are many professions women choose because of their different lifestyles. Leave alone the bit where if the woman decides to have a child, she'll be taking more days off work to tend to the child(not even counting the days off for labour reasons). It's unfair, but usually the case. Women are usually more family oriented, and nurturing, while men are usually less sensitive and work oriented. All this is of course changing, but it's to be expected that women get paid less than men. For an example, some fields like Military have always been male dominated, but if you look at me to point towards that as an excuse for better pay for men, you're wrong. In a nut-shell a woman should get the equal amount of pay for the equal amount of working hours, and the equal amount of work done by the male, or vice-versa if the female out-performs. But incase she does a lesser amount of work done, be it Lumber-jacking, Mason work, Accounting or Hair-dressing, for whatever be the reason(child care and labour holidays included) for her under-par performance, she does NOT, under any circumstance deserve the same pay. Simple as that. That's equality for you.


Only the real feminist may waste time reading this.
Here I wasn't even wasting time on talking about the half idiot bimbos who call themselves feminists. These are the women who want their doors to be opened by the men, their food to be paid for on dates by men, men to be getting up when a woman approaches a table etc. in the same breath will be preaching gender equality. You don't even know what gender equality is. Leave alone preach it. Go put on some make-up and occupy yourselves.
As for the smart kind who want gender equality, I'll give you an idea about a world with gender equality. In such a world, when one of you slaps a guy, you get slapped right back. It's a world where women are included in contact sports and laughed upon when they cry about breaking their nails. It's a world where it wouldn't be offensive to preach that full frontal nudity be telecast on TV without any qualms, after all guys are seen on TV without their shirts on all the time.


Feminism = Fascism
Feminism is in a lot of ways like fascism. Your average Fascist will disregard any scientific argument unless the conclusion supports his existing belief. The ideology comes first and the Fascist looks for anything to back it up, no matter how trivial, unreliable or discredited. Much like today's feminists and their ideology. A fascist might, for example, cast blame for unemployment and work discontent on immigrants "stealing" their jobs. Feminists similarly cast blame for women's lower average pay onto another party (men). Both feminists and fascists are quick to cast blame on someone else for anything that goes wrong in their lives.

For once be man enough(oh-the-irony) to stand up and take the responsibility for your shortcomings on yourself rather than blaming the other sex for everything that is wrong with you and your kind.

I'm so right, it scares me at times.
Let the hatred flow.